Then an Email Arrived from Ukraine

Norwegian craft distiller with distillation equipment

By R. G. Kvasir

One evening in February 2026, an email arrived from Ukraine. It was from Crafthouz, a company I had already been in contact with over barrels, wood, and all those ideas that tend to grow when two parties are curious about roughly the same things. We had previously touched upon hybrid barrels, combinations of stainless steel and oak. Now they had attached photographs of a test sample.
It was a stainless-steel cylinder with solid oak heads at both ends, not quite like the other hybrid barrels I had seen. I will admit that I opened the pictures a little too fast and read the rest of the email a little too late.

The Problem Behind the Romance

There is something I have spent far too long trying to understand about small barrels. A standard cask has a specific relationship between the internal wood surface area and the volume of spirit inside it. If you shrink the barrel down to three or five liters, that relationship completely vanishes. Each liter of spirit suddenly sees vastly more wood.

The result can be impressive for the first few weeks. Colour arrives quickly, vanilla shows up, and toast, caramel, and oak roll out like a red carpet. The spirit looks as though it has been sitting there for ten years, but then you taste it, and you discover that the wood has run completely ahead of everything else.

I have long been annoyed by the phrase “small barrels age spirit faster.” What they unquestionably do faster is extract compounds from the wood, which is not the same thing as maturation. You can make a spirit brown fairly quickly, but getting all the individual parts to stop behaving like strangers in the same glass takes longer. I know this from experience. My own five-liter barrel taught me that lesson in three months, leaving the tannins standing like a dry wall in my throat.

Crafthouz had been thinking about that exact geometry and had done the math. Even a small one-liter vessel was meant to end up with the same ratio of wood surface area to liquid volume as a traditional 225-liter cask. Their solution was oak at both ends instead of a single wooden lid, with dimensions calculated to bring the wood-to-liquid ratio down to the level of a proper barrel. The steel was not supposed to contribute anything at all. It was simply there to hold the liquid, while the oak did the interesting work.

I liked the idea immediately. Then, naturally, I started asking questions.

The Annoying Customer

I wanted to know exactly how the oak was fitted into the steel. Was there glue? Sealant? Some hidden synthetic material sitting there for years in contact with high-proof spirit?
Nothing.
The oak heads were around 25 millimeters thick and fitted directly into the steel body, relying entirely on old barrel physics inside a fairly modern-looking object where the seal came from the wood swelling and tightening into place. That made me smile.

Then we came to linseed oil. Crafthouz normally treated the exterior of the oak lightly with raw linseed oil to protect the timber, prevent stains, and make the vessel look better. They explained that raw linseed oil penetrates the wood rather than forming a varnish, arguing that the timber would still be able to breathe.

I was not entirely convinced. My interest in the oak was not cosmetic. If the entire point of the wooden ends was to preserve some of the slow interaction between air, wood, and spirit, I did not want to introduce another variable simply to make it look prettier on a shelf. I wanted mine untreated.

Crafthouz disagreed with my concern and explained why, but then they did something I appreciate enormously in people who actually make things:

They made them untreated anyway.

No drama, no sales pitches, just a straightforward agreement that if that was how I wanted to test them, that was how they would build them. That small exchange probably says more about how our collaboration developed than any polished story about synergies ever could. We did not always start at the same conclusion; we just kept discussing the problem.

Two Different Ends

The more I studied the construction, the more possibilities appeared. A standard barrel surrounds the liquid with staves, and while you can vary the toast and char from barrel to barrel, it remains one continuous wooden structure. The vessel from Crafthouz, however, had two separate oak heads.

So I sent them another message: What if the two ends were different, one end medium toasted and the other heavily charred?

Suddenly, the strange geometry was not just a solution to the small-barrel problem; it was an advantage. Two separate pieces of oak meant two different treatments inside the same small volume. Their answer was essentially yes, we can make that, and so one of the three-liter vessels became exactly that. One end toasted, one end charred. This was not because a marketing department had decided that “dual maturation technology” would look impressive in a brochure, but because two parties writing emails to each other thought it might be interesting to see what happened. That is much more my kind of product development.

The order grew step by step. What started as curiosity about a prototype ended with four vessels: two small one-liter versions with medium char, one three-liter with a heavy “crocodile” char, and the experimental three-liter vessel with different treatments at each end. These were not products you could simply click on in the Crafthouz webshop. The hybrid vessels were still prototypes in practice, made in small numbers while the design was being developed, which only made them more interesting.

A Tool for Slowing Down Time

The first thing I noticed when the package arrived from Ukraine was the weight. They felt substantial. The steel was thick, the oak heads were thick, and there was nothing delicate or fragile about them. They looked like something meant to sit quietly in a workshop for years, not something designed to look cute on a shelf, which was exactly what I wanted.

By this point, my goal had also changed. I was no longer thinking about whether the system could make maturation faster. Quite the opposite. I wanted to know if it could make small-scale maturation slower.

That might sound strange, but if a small traditional barrel gives the spirit too much oak too quickly, trying to turn up the speed on everything else seems like attacking the wrong side of the equation. Perhaps it is better to slow the wood down: less active oak per liter, extraction at a more reasonable pace, and then waiting.

Real time.

Not three months pretending to be “ten-year-old whisky” or miracle ageing, but just enough time for the things that cannot be rushed to happen at the pace they clearly prefer.

This setup also turns out to be an ideal experimental platform. If I have one batch of spirit and want to understand how different wood treatments affect it in small traditional oak barrels, a lot of noise gets introduced immediately through minor barrel variations, massive wood exposure, and rapid extraction. With a defined steel vessel and oak heads with different treatments, the question becomes far cleaner: What did the wood actually change? For someone who has spent far too much of his life changing one variable and then staring at the result, that is hard to resist.

From Customer to Something Else?

Looking back through the emails, I cannot find the exact moment where the relationship with Crafthouz shifted. There were no formal meetings, no strategy documents, and no message declaring that we were now “collaborating.” I was simply a customer asking too many questions, and Crafthouz was a manufacturer who kept answering them.

I suggested things; sometimes they agreed, sometimes they explained why they did something differently, and occasionally an idea was simple enough that they just built it so we could see what happened. Along the way, I started telling other people about the product because I genuinely found it interesting.

I still love traditional oak barrels. A full wooden cask is a beautifully complex system that breathes through its entire body, reacts to temperature and humidity, loses spirit to the room, and develops in ways that are never fully predictable. A steel vessel with oak heads is not identical to that and should not pretend to be. But I also do not believe that every single experimental four-liter batch needs to be thrown into a small traditional barrel and assaulted by oak simply because barrels have looked that way for hundreds of years. The shape is tradition, but the physics underneath it is the interesting part.

The email from Ukraine did not give me a shortcut through maturation. It gave me a new way to think about the problem, and more and more, that is exactly what I am looking for. Not ways to make time disappear, but ways to give time enough room to do its job.

Want to Go Deeper?

The relationship between wood, extraction, oxygen, geometry, and time is explored much further in The No Rule Distiller, together with the mistakes and experiments that changed the way I think about maturation.

Find The No Rule Distiller on Amazon

For more experiments, background, and ongoing projects, visit https://noruledistiller.com

 

1 thought on “Then an Email Arrived from Ukraine”

  1. Rune,

    Thank you for the article, really enjoyed it. You raised some interesting points that I’d love to discuss further, especially the wood-to-volume ratio.

    I completely agree that small barrels extract very fast, often much faster than the other processes involved in maturation can develop. A proper three-year maturation like in a large cask is often difficult in a fresh small barrel. The spirit could become heavily over-oaked.

    That said, even after just a few weeks in a small barrel, the spirit already has a recognizable aged character. An experienced taster or a professional would probably tell it apart from a true three-year-old, but for home distillers it’s a way to experiment and learn before moving on to larger barrels. What do you think?

    But I’m curious what you think about this:

    1. Small virgin oak barrels after 2–3 fills. What if a small new oak barrel is used for finishing during the first two or three fills, while the oak is at its most aggressive? After that the wood may give much less, but the high surface-area-to-volume ratio could still influence how much oxygen enters the spirit per liter. Could the barrel then work for proper maturation, with calmer extraction and controlled oxygen exposure? Have you tested anything like that?

    Or here’s another approach. What if you fill a new small barrel with a distillate (or another drink) and let it age until it has extracted a good amount of wood character? Then you blend it with the same unaged distillate or drink and transfer the mixture into a barrel that has already been used for one or two cycles, leaving it there for further maturation. Have you ever tried something like this, blending and transferring spirits between barrels? It seems like another interesting way to work with small barrels.

    2. Small barrels in practice. Which spirits or styles do you think work best in small barrels, both for finishing during the first fills and for maturation after several cycles?

    3. Slow vs. fast oxidation. Do you think slow oxidation gives better results than faster oxidation? Or is it more about the total amount of oxygen the spirit receives? In other words, if a spirit takes in the same amount of oxygen slowly over a long time or faster over a shorter time, would the result be different? My guess is that the results would probably be different, but which one is better might simply come down to personal taste, don’t you think? Perhaps we’d end up with two different spirits, each with its own character.

    Looking forward to your thoughts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *